Divorce When Only One Partner Lives in Massachusetts
September 4, 2020
How much time do I have to file a personal injury case in Massachusetts?
October 2, 2020
In Massachusetts, over 8, 000 people have already died from Covid-19. Along with hospitals, many of these deaths have also occurred in overcrowded, ill-prepared long-term care facilities. Despite this, many people continue to act as if there is no danger, with no regard for the deadly consequences of their actions. From inappropriate beach parties thrown by dozens or hundreds of teenagers at once, to thousands gathering to exercise their constitutional rights in protest, many Americans—and many Massachusetts residents—have knowingly and willingly acted in defiance of government safety recommendations.
For the grieving survivors of COVID-19 victims or for patients slowly recovering, they may wonder—can these people be held liable for these reckless actions? Is this negligence and can one file a wrongful death claim if they caught Covid-19 at one of these gatherings and died?
New Law Shields Many from Liability
In April, a new law came into effect in Massachusetts that shields all caregivers, medical professionals, and medical facilities from liability for wrongful death or injury in the period beginning March 10, when coronavirus led to a state of emergency declaration. The bill, which also shields certain volunteer groups from liability, shields from liability any doctor, nurse, caregiver—or the facilities in which they work—so long as the alleged loss occurred in the course of “good-faith” COVID treatment or during a COVID outbreak at the facility.
The only exception, allowing for claims against medical settings and professionals, is if the injury was the result of gross negligence, recklessness, or bad faith.
This makes it very difficult to recover damages for COVID patients or their survivors, since it will be difficult to prove that actions by defendant were reckless, as opposed to the natural consequence of a state of emergency.
Moving Forward
This law has already been the target of an outpouring of criticism—and rightfully so. It will undoubtedly be challenged in court.